I’m aware of organizations and initiatives that bridge between capital and impact, what I was looking for, however, was if there is an oversimplified and rough impact portfolio. I underline ‘oversimplified’ and ‘rough’ as any such portfolio will depend on the donor’s nature and preferences (government of a poor country, climate-activist billionaire, tech co’s CSR, etc...) but perhaps someone somewhere did such a division with at least a hint of quantitative diligence and with the breadth of taking all main thematic categories in consideration.
For example, if someone has a 100bil (or a 100k) how much, very roughly, makes sense to be given to long-term causes vs current suffering alleviation, or how much towards AI alignment vs policy lobbying, etc..
All answers are probably wrong, but they help getting closer to the optimal
I’m aware of organizations and initiatives that bridge between capital and impact, what I was looking for, however, was if there is an oversimplified and rough impact portfolio. I underline ‘oversimplified’ and ‘rough’ as any such portfolio will depend on the donor’s nature and preferences (government of a poor country, climate-activist billionaire, tech co’s CSR, etc...) but perhaps someone somewhere did such a division with at least a hint of quantitative diligence and with the breadth of taking all main thematic categories in consideration.
For example, if someone has a 100bil (or a 100k) how much, very roughly, makes sense to be given to long-term causes vs current suffering alleviation, or how much towards AI alignment vs policy lobbying, etc..
All answers are probably wrong, but they help getting closer to the optimal