Actually, the point doesn’t seem to be “we cannot justify the existence of supererogatory actions”, but more something like “unless you are 100% sure the act is not obligatory, if you think that doing it is morally better than not doing it, then you should do it”
Actually, the point doesn’t seem to be “we cannot justify the existence of supererogatory actions”, but more something like “unless you are 100% sure the act is not obligatory, if you think that doing it is morally better than not doing it, then you should do it”