This is a good point and not one I’d thought of before. Thank you.
Re ‘saintly’, it is intended as a joke. Do you think it’s more offensive than funny? Or not worth the risk?
Re diversity, I can’t help that I’m the founder and I’m white, but having a more diverse advisory board sounds good. Do you have any ideas as to who would be good advisors for this sort of thing? Important to note that all the advisors are completely pro bono.
I don’t find anything wrong at all with ‘saintly’ personally, and took it as a joke. But I could imagine someone taking it the wrong way. Maybe I’d see what others on the forum think
This is a good point and not one I’d thought of before. Thank you.
Re ‘saintly’, it is intended as a joke. Do you think it’s more offensive than funny? Or not worth the risk?
Re diversity, I can’t help that I’m the founder and I’m white, but having a more diverse advisory board sounds good. Do you have any ideas as to who would be good advisors for this sort of thing? Important to note that all the advisors are completely pro bono.
Changed! Thanks for the input
Sanjay has a lot of experience on the advisory/trustee side of charities. I’d recommend sending him a PM if you haven’t already.
I don’t find anything wrong at all with ‘saintly’ personally, and took it as a joke. But I could imagine someone taking it the wrong way. Maybe I’d see what others on the forum think
Upside seems low, downside seems pretty high.
Agree with alexrjl