Seems like some form of Pascal’s Wager is valid in this case—it’s hard to know for sure what the impact of nukes will be, especially without the benefit of hindsight, so it’s better to err on the side of caution.
What’s the “side of caution” in this case?
Seems like some form of Pascal’s Wager is valid in this case—it’s hard to know for sure what the impact of nukes will be, especially without the benefit of hindsight, so it’s better to err on the side of caution.
What’s the “side of caution” in this case?