As our models “only” examine the correlation between different variables and LTR, we cannot make any conclusive statements about a causal relationship linking “higher scores for community-related activities” to “higher LTR”. Technically, it is possible that the connections we found are spurious and do not represent the true causal mechanism which leads people to recommend an event more highly.
Perhaps this could be presented earlier on— to me it seems likely that there is reverse causality, other channels, etc.
Perhaps this could be presented earlier on— to me it seems likely that there is reverse causality, other channels, etc.