The link you shared does not work, but I assume it was meant to be pointing at the classic study on orchestral interviews from 1997/2000. However, recent re-analysis of the paper (here, here, here, here) shows if anything it supports the opposite conclusion:
This table unambiguously shows that men are doing comparatively better in blind auditions than in non-blind auditions. The −0.022 number is the proportion of women that are successful in the audition process minus the proportion of men that are successful. Thus a larger proportion of men than women are successful in blind auditions, the exact opposite of what is claimed.
The ‘fact’ that blinded auditions help women overcome bias in non-blinded auditions came from some dubious pre-replication-crisis analysis, where the authors picked a small subset (often less than three orchestras!) of the data to try to find the effect they are looking for:
The impact of the screen is positive and large in magnitude, but only when there is no semifinal round. Women are about 5 percentage points more likely to be hired than are men in a completely blind audition, although the effect is not statistically significant. The effect is nil, however, when there is a semifinal round, perhaps as a result of the unusual effects of the semifinal round.
… but even with this p-hacking the authors failed to achieve statistical significance.
So on the whole this suggests that musician interviews is another case where the process was originally biased against men, and blinding helped reduce this bias.
The link you shared does not work, but I assume it was meant to be pointing at the classic study on orchestral interviews from 1997/2000. However, recent re-analysis of the paper (here, here, here, here) shows if anything it supports the opposite conclusion:
The ‘fact’ that blinded auditions help women overcome bias in non-blinded auditions came from some dubious pre-replication-crisis analysis, where the authors picked a small subset (often less than three orchestras!) of the data to try to find the effect they are looking for:
… but even with this p-hacking the authors failed to achieve statistical significance.
So on the whole this suggests that musician interviews is another case where the process was originally biased against men, and blinding helped reduce this bias.