I didn’t downvote it, but the premises don’t imply the conclusion.
This is because:
(a) it doesn’t consider the potential downsides of running for office
(b) there are ways to influence government spending other than directly running for office. Running for office is one option, but there are other options that could be more successful.
Why was this post so heavily downvoted?
I didn’t downvote it, but the premises don’t imply the conclusion.
This is because:
(a) it doesn’t consider the potential downsides of running for office
(b) there are ways to influence government spending other than directly running for office. Running for office is one option, but there are other options that could be more successful.
Sometimes what is most good is unpopular