I do see this concept as relevant to various EA issues for the reasons you’ve described, and I think high-quality content covering “the value of open societies, the meaning of openness, and how to protect and expand open societies” would be valuable. But I can’t immediately recall any Forum posts that do cover those topics explicitly. Do you know of posts that would warrant this tag?
If there aren’t yet posts that’d warrant this tag, then we have at least the following (not mutually exclusive) options:
This tag could be made later, once there are such posts
You could write a post of those topics yourself
An entry on those topics could be made
It’s ok to have entries that don’t have tagged posts
But it might be a bit odd for someone other than Pablo to jump to making an entry on a topic as one of the first pieces of EA writing on that topic?
Since wikis are meant to do things more like distilling existing work.
But I’m not sure.
This is related to the question of to what extent we should avoid “original research” on the EA Wiki, in the way Wikipedia avoids it
I do see this concept as relevant to various EA issues for the reasons you’ve described, and I think high-quality content covering “the value of open societies, the meaning of openness, and how to protect and expand open societies” would be valuable. But I can’t immediately recall any Forum posts that do cover those topics explicitly. Do you know of posts that would warrant this tag?
If there aren’t yet posts that’d warrant this tag, then we have at least the following (not mutually exclusive) options:
This tag could be made later, once there are such posts
You could write a post of those topics yourself
An entry on those topics could be made
It’s ok to have entries that don’t have tagged posts
But it might be a bit odd for someone other than Pablo to jump to making an entry on a topic as one of the first pieces of EA writing on that topic?
Since wikis are meant to do things more like distilling existing work.
But I’m not sure.
This is related to the question of to what extent we should avoid “original research” on the EA Wiki, in the way Wikipedia avoids it
See also
Some other entry/tag could be made to cover similar ground