Speculative: NLP for claim detection: the site asks you for your probabilities about the main claims. Time cost: 30 mins.
You think it’d take only 30 minutes to implement a feature that detects claims in forum posts? I’m not a web developer but that strikes me as wildly optimistic.
I think all time costs stated are time costs to author of the post.
From a product and ML implementation perspective and for the NLP component of the problem, I think in this case, it might be easy to build an 80% good solution.
It’s less that the system will find and understand all arguments but more like the author might be asked questions and it’s relatively easy to see if the answers cover the same space as the post content.
My guess is that manipulation won’t make sense or even enter into peoples minds (with other design choices not related to the NLP) so a useful system that say gives guide rails is much easier to implement.
You think it’d take only 30 minutes to implement a feature that detects claims in forum posts? I’m not a web developer but that strikes me as wildly optimistic.
I think all time costs stated are time costs to author of the post.
From a product and ML implementation perspective and for the NLP component of the problem, I think in this case, it might be easy to build an 80% good solution.
It’s less that the system will find and understand all arguments but more like the author might be asked questions and it’s relatively easy to see if the answers cover the same space as the post content.
My guess is that manipulation won’t make sense or even enter into peoples minds (with other design choices not related to the NLP) so a useful system that say gives guide rails is much easier to implement.
Ah, you’re right, I misinterpreted it since the epistemic status suggestion said time per post and that one didn’t.