Interesting, I think I only endorse a weak version of this claim and expect replies to the post to be fairly nitpicky which would make writing the post annoying.
Otoh (the weak version) seems pretty obvious to me, which makes me excited to write a longer post making the case for it, are there any particular points you’d like such a post cover?
A few things could be useful: - An overview of funders in the space/ new funders and how things have changed recently. - How changing priorities has or hasn’t changed the profile of the people applying for LTFF funding - Where the biggest opportunities (some combination of importance and availability of funding) are for people who might be reading a forum post.
Also you can always post during draft amnesty and use the built in excuse to not respond to comments (i.e. we have a table you can put at the top of your post where you can say “I only endorse a weak version of this claim and I probably won’t be responding to comments” or something to that effect)
Interesting, I think I only endorse a weak version of this claim and expect replies to the post to be fairly nitpicky which would make writing the post annoying.
Otoh (the weak version) seems pretty obvious to me, which makes me excited to write a longer post making the case for it, are there any particular points you’d like such a post cover?
A few things could be useful:
- An overview of funders in the space/ new funders and how things have changed recently.
- How changing priorities has or hasn’t changed the profile of the people applying for LTFF funding
- Where the biggest opportunities (some combination of importance and availability of funding) are for people who might be reading a forum post.
Also you can always post during draft amnesty and use the built in excuse to not respond to comments (i.e. we have a table you can put at the top of your post where you can say “I only endorse a weak version of this claim and I probably won’t be responding to comments” or something to that effect)