I don’t think seatbelts are very controversial, though admittedly it’s more of a minor example than the things you’ve mentioned.
Mandatory vaccinations and certain other restrictions on children’s rights (eg joining the military, smoking, gambling) are often usually regarded as appropriate as well, though those cases are more debatable.
I was thinking of mandatory vaccinations, but I thought it seemed more like a case of requirements for community health rather than paternalism proper (focused on the wellbeing of the target of enforcement).
I don’t think seatbelts are very controversial, though admittedly it’s more of a minor example than the things you’ve mentioned.
Mandatory vaccinations and certain other restrictions on children’s rights (eg joining the military, smoking, gambling) are often usually regarded as appropriate as well, though those cases are more debatable.
I was thinking of mandatory vaccinations, but I thought it seemed more like a case of requirements for community health rather than paternalism proper (focused on the wellbeing of the target of enforcement).