RSS

Cer­tifi­cate of impact

TagLast edit: 17 May 2023 9:32 UTC by Leo

A certificate of impact (also known as an impact certificate) is a kind of altruistic instrument at the center of a funding model proposed by Paul Christiano. Certificates of impact attempt to harness the benefits of the price system in altruistic contexts, where prices are usually unavailable.

In this model, altruistic work receives some or all of its funding after completion rather than beforehand. Once an individual or organization completes work with a positive social impact, they can apply for a certificate of impact. They can then sell this certificate to another organization or individual. Following the sale, the new certificate holder can claim credit for the project’s impact, and the organization that carried out the project must acknowledge that they have sold its impact.

This scheme has been proposed and tested by some members of the effective altruism community. They argue that the scheme is better than funding incomplete projects, because it allows for payments by results rather than by effort, which better incentivizes those running the project to do a good job. They also argue that awarding certificates of impact might be simpler and clearer than pre-funding projects.

Related models

Recently, some related funding models have been proposed.

In early May 2021, the organization Noora Health—which implements educational programs for mothers of newborns in South Asia—launched a non-fungible token (NFT) which may in some respects be regarded as a certificate of impact. The auction opened with a list price of $2.5 million, and computer scientist and tech entrepreneur Paul Graham—a long-time supporter of the organization—placed the winning bid of ETH 1337, at the time worth $5.23 million.[1][2] A difference between this use of NFTs and certificates of impact as conceived by Christiano is that those bidding in the NFT auction pay for the prospect of future impact. In contrast, an impact purchase is a transaction involving the transfer of past impact.

In late July, a group of authors, in collaboration with Vitalik Buterin, proposed a model called retroactive public goods funding.[3] The model consists of a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO), called “the Results Oracle”, which funds projects with high social value. The funding is done retrospectively rather than prospectively, by assessing the value of the project after it has been completed. Once the Results Oracle evaluates a project, it can send the reward to the person or group responsible for the project, or, alternatively, it can use the funds to establish a price floor for a token associated with the project. As the authors note, rewarding via a project token effectively creates a prediction market for the amount of funding the Results Oracle will decide to allocate to the project, and allows the same project to be funded multiple times or by other sources besides the Results Oracle.

Further reading

Christiano, Paul (2014) Certificates of impact, Rational Altruist, November 15.

Christiano, Paul & Katja Grace (2015a) Why certificates?, The Impact Purchase.
An explanation of the benefits of certificates of impact.

Christiano, Paul & Katja Grace (2015b) Certificates of impact, The Impact Purchase.

Hoffman, Ben (2016) Minimum viable impact purchases, Compass Rose, August 29.

Kuhn, Ben (2015) I just sold half of a blog post, Ben Kuhn’s Blog, April.
A good intuitive description of the idea of impact purchase.

Leong, Chris (2020) Making impact purchases viable, Effective Altruism Forum, April 17.

Linsefors, Linda (2020) The case for impact purchase | part 1, Effective Altruism Forum, April 14.

Rose, Eli (2020) Do impact certificates help if you’re not sure your work is effective?, Effective Altruism Forum, February 12.

Related entries

effective altruism funding | markets for altruism | prize

  1. ^

    Noora Health (2021) Save thousands of lives, OpenSea.

  2. ^

    Graham, Paul (2021) An NFT that saves lives, Paul Graham’s Website, May.

  3. ^

    Wang, Jinglan et al. (2021) Retroactive public goods funding, Ethereum Optimism Blog, July 20.

Retro fun­der pro­file & Man­i­fund team recs (ACX Grants 2024: Im­pact Mar­ket)

Saul Munn26 Mar 2024 3:29 UTC
12 points
22 comments7 min readEA link

In­vest in ACX Grants pro­jects!

Saul Munn6 Mar 2024 21:02 UTC
41 points
2 comments3 min readEA link

Ex­plain­ing Im­pact Markets

Saul Munn31 Jan 2024 9:48 UTC
13 points
1 comment3 min readEA link
(www.brasstacks.blog)

Man­i­fund: 2023 in Review

Austin18 Jan 2024 23:50 UTC
29 points
1 comment23 min readEA link
(manifund.substack.com)

Link Col­lec­tion: Im­pact Markets

Saul Munn26 Dec 2023 9:07 UTC
10 points
0 comments2 min readEA link
(www.brasstacks.blog)

A $10k retroac­tive grant for VaccinateCA

Austin26 Jul 2023 19:43 UTC
58 points
0 comments6 min readEA link
(manifund.org)

A Fresh FAQ on GiveWiki and Im­pact Mar­kets Generally

Dawn Drescher6 Apr 2023 14:02 UTC
24 points
1 comment20 min readEA link
(impactmarkets.substack.com)

hec­toMana: tax-de­ductible gam­bling chips

Rachel Weinberg1 Apr 2023 21:02 UTC
12 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Man­i­fund x AI Worldviews

Austin31 Mar 2023 15:32 UTC
32 points
2 comments2 min readEA link
(manifund.org)

Man­i­fund Im­pact Mar­ket /​ Mini-Grants Round On Forecasting

Scott Alexander24 Feb 2023 6:14 UTC
59 points
2 comments1 min readEA link
(astralcodexten.substack.com)

Crypto loves im­pact mar­kets: Notes from Schel­ling Point Bogotá

Rachel Shu22 Oct 2022 15:58 UTC
22 points
0 comments7 min readEA link

Hyper­certs: A new prim­i­tive for pub­lic goods funding

DC10 Sep 2022 21:43 UTC
31 points
1 comment2 min readEA link
(protocol.ai)

Im­pact Shares For Spec­u­la­tive Projects

Elizabeth6 Sep 2022 21:20 UTC
20 points
7 comments7 min readEA link
(acesounderglass.com)

Re­source con­straints and lik­ing con­straints: Ad­dress­ing two is­sues with im­pact certificates

brb24322 Aug 2022 14:52 UTC
6 points
0 comments1 min readEA link

Retroac­tive fund­ing with sub­sidy markets

Donald Hobson16 Jul 2022 19:41 UTC
16 points
4 comments8 min readEA link

Im­pact Mar­kets: The An­noy­ing Details

Scott Alexander15 Jul 2022 5:34 UTC
112 points
46 comments27 min readEA link

Im­pact mar­kets may in­cen­tivize pre­dictably net-nega­tive projects

Ofer21 Jun 2022 13:00 UTC
113 points
76 comments4 min readEA link

Retroac­tive fund­ing im­pact quan­tifi­ca­tion and maximization

brb24310 Jun 2022 22:33 UTC
7 points
3 comments2 min readEA link

How to al­lo­cate im­pact shares of a past project

brb24310 Jun 2022 22:32 UTC
13 points
5 comments1 min readEA link

Ex­per­i­ment in Retroac­tive Fund­ing: An EA Fo­rum Prize Contest

DC1 Jun 2022 21:15 UTC
95 points
16 comments8 min readEA link

Chain­ing Retroac­tive Fun­ders to Bor­row Against Un­likely Utopias

Dawn Drescher19 Apr 2022 18:25 UTC
24 points
4 comments9 min readEA link
(impactmarkets.substack.com)

Half Price Im­pact Certificates

hbesceli1 Apr 2022 14:23 UTC
64 points
1 comment1 min readEA link

Toward Im­pact Markets

Dawn Drescher15 Mar 2022 22:08 UTC
52 points
11 comments59 min readEA link
(impactmarkets.substack.com)

Will “im­pact cer­tifi­cates” value only im­pact?

RyanCarey5 Mar 2022 1:31 UTC
17 points
15 comments5 min readEA link

Be­ing an in­di­vi­d­ual al­ign­ment grantmaker

A_donor28 Feb 2022 16:39 UTC
34 points
20 comments2 min readEA link

“Should have been hired” Prizes

Larks19 Jan 2022 14:19 UTC
38 points
4 comments2 min readEA link

Jan­uary 1, 2030

Brennen Hodge30 Oct 2021 4:53 UTC
2 points
0 comments5 min readEA link

[Question] Should Grants Fund EA Pro­jects Ret­ro­spec­tively?

FCCC8 Sep 2021 2:58 UTC
32 points
10 comments1 min readEA link

Im­pact Cer­tifi­cates on a Blockchain

RowanBDonovan3 Aug 2021 14:57 UTC
44 points
31 comments21 min readEA link

Re­duc­ing Trans­ac­tion Costs, or Coasean Effec­tive Altruism

IvanVendrov31 May 2021 1:11 UTC
23 points
0 comments4 min readEA link

For­get re­place­abil­ity? (for ~com­mu­nity pro­jects)

Owen Cotton-Barratt31 Mar 2021 14:41 UTC
62 points
25 comments5 min readEA link

Plan for Im­pact Cer­tifi­cate MVP

lifelonglearner1 Oct 2020 21:54 UTC
42 points
13 comments1 min readEA link
(whalerdao.org)

Mak­ing Im­pact Pur­chases Viable

Chris Leong17 Apr 2020 23:01 UTC
23 points
9 comments3 min readEA link

The Case for Im­pact Pur­chase | Part 1

Linda Linsefors14 Apr 2020 13:08 UTC
51 points
39 comments8 min readEA link

Do im­pact cer­tifi­cates help if you’re not sure your work is effec­tive?

Eli Rose12 Feb 2020 14:13 UTC
21 points
12 comments1 min readEA link

Altru­is­tic equity allocation

Paul_Christiano16 Oct 2019 5:54 UTC
85 points
5 comments7 min readEA link

Im­pact Prizes as an al­ter­na­tive to Cer­tifi­cates of Impact

Ozzie Gooen20 Feb 2019 21:25 UTC
39 points
17 comments8 min readEA link

What is up with car­bon diox­ide and cog­ni­tion? An offer

Paul_Christiano6 Apr 2016 1:18 UTC
11 points
22 comments2 min readEA link

Ex­plain­ing im­pact purchases

Ben Kuhn16 Apr 2015 0:53 UTC
10 points
0 comments3 min readEA link

Im­pact pur­chase first round results

Katja_Grace10 Apr 2015 3:43 UTC
13 points
4 comments5 min readEA link

$10k of Ex­per­i­men­tal EA Funding

Paul_Christiano25 Feb 2015 19:54 UTC
19 points
29 comments1 min readEA link

Cer­tifi­cates of impact

Paul_Christiano11 Nov 2014 5:22 UTC
54 points
41 comments8 min readEA link