RSS

Con­straints on effec­tive altruism

TagLast edit: 15 Jun 2021 14:48 UTC by Pablo

The effective altruism community requires various resources that exist in limited supply, such as talent, funding, entrepreneurship, vetting, risk tolerance, and the ability to coordinate. These resources may be seen as constraints on effective altruism, insofar as they limit the community’s capacity to attain its goals.

Consider two organizations, both of which have ten staff and would like to increase capacity:

  1. Organization A: Has annual funding of $5m, so can fund more staff, and has been actively hiring for a year, but has been unable to find anyone suitable.

  2. Organization B: Has annual funding under $1m, so can only just cover current costs. Several suitably talented individuals have made speculative applications to the organization, but the organization could not afford to hire them.

Organization A is more talent constrained than funding constrained, and vice versa for Organization B. One might also say that Organization A faces more of a talent gap and organization B faces more of a funding gap (Todd, 2015). We can generalize these concepts:

These concepts are not precisely defined: rather, there tends to be a spectrum between the extremes that Organization A and Organization B occupy.

One of the key decisions people face when they want to support a cause is whether to work directly on that cause, or whether to earn to give in order to fund that cause. A key consideration relevant to this decision is whether the cause is talent constrained or funding constrained, since that will influence what kind of resource is most needed.

However, this consideration is also simplistic in some ways, and has at times been misinterpreted or misused. Todd (2018) lists nine common misconceptions related to the idea of “talent gaps”. More recently, Todd et al. (2020) has argued that the main bottlenecks for the effective altruism community now are neither general “talent” constraints nor funding constraints, but rather “specific skills and capacity”, such as “organizational capacity, infrastructure, and management to help train people up, as well as specialist skills that people can put to work now.” (See also scalably involving people.) It has also been suggested that the next major bottleneck might be “coordination — the ability to make sure people keep working efficiently and effectively together as the community grows” (Todd et al., 2020; see also cooperation and coordination).

Bibliography

Agarwalla, Vaidehi (2020) Collection of constraints in EA, Effective Altruism Forum, July 15.

Koehler, Arden & Keiran Harris (2020) Benjamin Todd on what the effective altruism community most needs, 80,000 Hours, November 12.

Naik, Vipul (2014) On the concept of “talent-constrained” organizations, LessWrong, March 14.
Suggests that organizations might simply not be paying enough for talent, causing talent constraints, although there are countervailing considerations.

Todd, Benjamin (2015) Why you should focus more on talent gaps, not funding gaps, 80,000 Hours, November 27.

Todd, Benjamin (2018) Think twice before talking about ‘talent gaps’ – clarifying nine misconceptions, 80,000 Hours, November 12.

Related entries

career choice | direct work | effective altruism hiring | earning to give | effective giving | get involved | scalably using labour | working at EA vs non-EA orgs

What ar­eas are the most promis­ing to start new EA meta char­i­ties—A sur­vey of 40 EAs

Joey23 Dec 2020 12:24 UTC
132 points
12 comments16 min readEA link

Ta­lent gaps from the per­spec­tive of a tal­ent limited or­ga­ni­za­tion.

Joey3 Nov 2017 4:41 UTC
20 points
19 commentsEA link

“EA” doesn’t have a tal­ent gap. Differ­ent causes have differ­ent gaps.

Kat Woods20 May 2018 22:07 UTC
44 points
18 commentsEA link

Prob­lem anal­y­sis of the tal­ent bot­tle­neck in EAA’s

lauren_mee21 Sep 2019 10:26 UTC
58 points
7 comments6 min readEA link

Money Can’t (Easily) Buy Talent

Mark Xu22 Jan 2021 2:56 UTC
41 points
30 comments12 min readEA link
(markxu.com)

Cross-post: Think twice be­fore talk­ing about ‘tal­ent gaps’ – clar­ify­ing nine mis­con­cep­tions, by 80,000 Hours.

80000_Hours12 Nov 2018 20:52 UTC
50 points
7 commentsEA link

A naive anal­y­sis on if EA is Ta­lent constrained

agent1823 Mar 2020 23:09 UTC
30 points
17 comments15 min readEA link

Bot­tle­necks and Solu­tions for the X-Risk Ecosystem

FlorentBerthet8 Oct 2018 12:47 UTC
42 points
14 commentsEA link

Effec­tive an­i­mal ad­vo­cacy bot­tle­necks surveys

Jamie_Harris13 Jan 2021 13:38 UTC
25 points
0 comments32 min readEA link
(www.animaladvocacycareers.org)

A short sur­vey on bot­tle­necks in effec­tive an­i­mal ad­vo­cacy from nine at­ten­dees of Effec­tive Altru­ism Global London

Jamie_Harris24 Oct 2019 7:00 UTC
5 points
0 comments1 min readEA link
(butcantheysuffer.wordpress.com)

EA Lead­ers Fo­rum: Sur­vey on EA pri­ori­ties (data and anal­y­sis)

Aaron Gertler12 Nov 2019 1:14 UTC
106 points
48 comments16 min readEA link

Sur­vey of EA org lead­ers about what skills and ex­pe­rience they most need, their staff/​dona­tions trade-offs, prob­lem pri­ori­ti­sa­tion, and more.

80000_Hours9 Oct 2018 23:33 UTC
13 points
33 commentsEA link

Many EA orgs say they place a lot of fi­nan­cial value on their pre­vi­ous hire. What does that mean, if any­thing? And why aren’t they hiring faster?

80000_Hours12 Oct 2018 18:55 UTC
23 points
39 commentsEA link

Re­cap—why do some or­gani­sa­tions say their re­cent hires are worth so much? (Link)

80000_Hours13 May 2019 18:01 UTC
34 points
4 comments1 min readEA link

A Frame­work for Think­ing about the EA La­bor Market

Jon_Behar8 May 2019 19:33 UTC
77 points
58 comments12 min readEA link

The Fu­ture of Earn­ing to Give

PeterMcCluskey13 Oct 2019 21:28 UTC
69 points
34 comments10 min readEA link
(www.bayesianinvestor.com)

EA is vet­ting-constrained

EA person9 Mar 2019 1:25 UTC
125 points
29 comments4 min readEA link