RSS

Uni­verse’s resources

TagLast edit: 14 Jul 2022 2:07 UTC by Pablo

The universe’s resources (sometimes called humanity’s cosmic endowment) is the stock of physical resources in the universe currently accessible to humanity.

If humanity does not go prematurely extinct, the number of people—or moral patients generally—who will ultimately exist is potentially astronomical. These figures are useful for judging the value of work aimed at influencing the long-term future, and in particular for estimating the importance of avoiding existential risks.

Nick Bostrom argues that, barring disaster, Earth will be capable of sustaining life for approximately another billion years.[1] This means that if Earth’s population were to remain fairly close to what is today, then, assuming hundred-year life-spans, the planet would ultimately host about people.

This is not an upper-bound on the possible number of people, however. If humans are ultimately able to colonize other star systems, then they will not be limited by Earth’s ability to sustain life. Given certain assumptions, Bostrom estimates that humanity could eventually reach to stars, which could sustain a total of around biological human beings, or around digital human minds.[2]

Further reading

Adams, Fred C. (2008) Long-term astrophysical processes, in Nick Bostrom & Milan M. Ćirković (eds.) Global Catastrophic Risks, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–47.

Ord, Toby (2021) The edges of our universe, ArXiv, 2104.01191.

Related entries

astronomical waste | computational power of the human brain | non-humans and the long-term future | space colonization | whole brain emulation

  1. ^

    Bostrom, Nick (2013) Existential risk prevention as global priority, Global Policy, vol. 4, pp. 15–31.

  2. ^

    Bostrom, Nick, Allan Dafoe & Carrick Flynn (2020) Public policy and superintelligent AI, in S. Matthew Liao (ed.) Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 293-326, p. 319.

On fu­ture peo­ple, look­ing back at 21st cen­tury longtermism

Joe_Carlsmith22 Mar 2021 8:21 UTC
102 points
13 comments12 min readEA link
No comments.