Hm, how could this interact with hypothetical clawbacks?
E.g.
your org has $0
your org receives $100 from FTXF, now your org has $100
your org spends $50 of that money, and then decides to stop
your org receive $10 from Nonlinear, now your org has $60
the clawback effort comes to your org and says “hey we need $100”. org say “I don’t have $100, I only have $50″
Does the clawback effort then say “No actually you have $60, we’re taking all $60” because of money fungibility?
There’s a weird detail I see in this post that seems to overemphasize the campaign’s success:
and
However, Carrick only received half as many votes as the winning candidate (results). Maybe this wasn’t immediately clear as the data was tentative, but I find it hard to update much on this data.