I really really like this kind of accounting of people’s thinking and mistakes; I think it’s a kind of “cognitive apprenticeship” that makes what is usually invisible (the inside of people’s heads) visible + does some great modelling of owning mistakes. It also has a great “speaker for the dead” quality, just telling things as they are (at least I hope! That’s definitely the vibe).
I’m really interested in improving “mechanisms for incentivizing and aggregating this sort of knowledge”, and have some thoughts in that direction; if people have more, I would like to hear them.
(A lot of the time lately when I write a comment this nice right after reading something (maybe 2 of the last 3? 2of the last 4 or 5 if you use different definitions, I wish I’d more tempered later, so I’ll come back and edit if that’s the case).
I really really like this kind of accounting of people’s thinking and mistakes; I think it’s a kind of “cognitive apprenticeship” that makes what is usually invisible (the inside of people’s heads) visible + does some great modelling of owning mistakes. It also has a great “speaker for the dead” quality, just telling things as they are (at least I hope! That’s definitely the vibe).
I’m really interested in improving “mechanisms for incentivizing and aggregating this sort of knowledge”, and have some thoughts in that direction; if people have more, I would like to hear them.
(A lot of the time lately when I write a comment this nice right after reading something (maybe 2 of the last 3? 2of the last 4 or 5 if you use different definitions, I wish I’d more tempered later, so I’ll come back and edit if that’s the case).