UPDATE: Joey answered this question here.
Wouldn’t it be more efficient to create new programs within existing charities rather than starting new charities?
Has someone written about this?
I’ve particularly noticed that there are many small charities working on animal advocacy.
(I can imagine both options have pros and cons, similar to startups vs big tech)
cc: @Joey
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
[Question] Why so many small charities?
UPDATE: Joey answered this question here.
Wouldn’t it be more efficient to create new programs within existing charities rather than starting new charities?
Has someone written about this?
I’ve particularly noticed that there are many small charities working on animal advocacy.
(I can imagine both options have pros and cons, similar to startups vs big tech)
cc: @Joey