Next week for the 80,000 Hours Podcast I’ll be interviewing Andreas Mogensen — Oxford philosopher, All Souls College Fellow and Assistant Director at the Global Priorities Institute.
He’s the author of, among other papers:
Against Large Number Scepticism
The Paralysis Argument
Giving Isn’t Demanding
Do Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Rest on a Mistake About Evolutionary Explanations?
Is Identity Illusory?
Maximal Cluelessness
Moral Demands and the Far Future
Do not go gentle: why the Asymmetry does not support anti-natalism
The only ethical argument for positive d? Partiality and pure time preference
Tough enough? Robust satisficing as a decision norm for long-term policy analysis
Staking our future: deontic long-termism and the non-identity problem
Somewhat unusually among philosophers working on effective altruist ideas, Andreas leans towards deontological approaches to ethics.
What should I ask him?
[Question] I’m interviewing Oxford philosopher, global priorities researcher and early thinker in EA, Andreas Mogensen. What should I ask him?
Next week for the 80,000 Hours Podcast I’ll be interviewing Andreas Mogensen — Oxford philosopher, All Souls College Fellow and Assistant Director at the Global Priorities Institute.
He’s the author of, among other papers:
Against Large Number Scepticism
The Paralysis Argument
Giving Isn’t Demanding
Do Evolutionary Debunking Arguments Rest on a Mistake About Evolutionary Explanations?
Is Identity Illusory?
Maximal Cluelessness
Moral Demands and the Far Future
Do not go gentle: why the Asymmetry does not support anti-natalism
The only ethical argument for positive d? Partiality and pure time preference
Tough enough? Robust satisficing as a decision norm for long-term policy analysis
Staking our future: deontic long-termism and the non-identity problem
Somewhat unusually among philosophers working on effective altruist ideas, Andreas leans towards deontological approaches to ethics.
What should I ask him?