Ide­olog­i­cal Tur­ing test

TagLast edit: 22 Apr 2021 17:32 UTC by Pablo

The ideological Turing test (sometimes called the political Turing test (Hannon 2020: 10)) is a test of a person’s ability to state opposing views as clearly and persuasively as those views are stated by their proponents. The test was originally proposed by Bryan Caplan (Caplan 2011), in analogy with Alan Turing’s “imitation game”—more widely known as the Turing test—, which measures a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour indistinguishable from that of a human.


Brin, David (2000) Disputation arenas: Harnessing conflict and competitiveness for society’s benefit, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, vol. 15, pp. 597–618.

Caplan, Bryan (2011) The ideological Turing test, Econlog, June 20.

Galef, Julia (2021) The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don’t, New York: Portfolio.

Hannon, Michael (2020) Empathetic understanding and deliberative democracy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 101, pp. 591–611.

Kling, Arnold (2013) The Three Languages of Politics: Talking across the Political Divides, Washington: Cato Institute.

Related entries

Bryan Caplan | deference and social epistemology

Book Sum­mary: “Mes­sages: The Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Skills Book” Part I & II

konrad9 Nov 2018 8:47 UTC
6 points
4 commentsEA link

The Tur­ing Test

Ales_Flidr11 Sep 2017 1:20 UTC
15 points
8 commentsEA link
No comments.