Highly recommend this!
Ben Anderson
Karma: 257
Thanks David!
Thank you and good catch!
Hi Chris, I don’t believe that it will be recorded but I will be running an online event next Monday which will be in the exact same format. Here is the info:
Online Workshop
Mon Oct 14, 6:30 PM − 7:30 PM
Zoom: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/82480438660
Register your interest HERE
Looking forward to that workshop happening Shepard!
Glad to hear you agree with Sam, its something I will be looking more into over the next few days. The draft of asks is very much a draft, so thank you to Sam Hilton for all of his thoughts and I want others to feel free to comment directly on the document as well.
Thank you for this post Lee, I really do appreciate it.
This is definitely a disappointing result and not what I wanted out of this consultation. However for me this does not reduce the potential of this path to impact; of influencing policy outcomes by coordinating submissions to consultations.
The first reason for this belief is the successes in Australia. The second reason is the ICAI consultation I worked on last October, where I coordinated around ~60 submissions, and successfully influenced the consultation’s results. For each of the four questions ICAI asked, they listed the top recommendations given. The top answer that they list for each question directly corresponds to our top recommendation that we gave to attendees to push forward (e.g. use of best buys, cash-benchmarking). A number of our secondary arguments are also prominently included.
However, even with this success they state that ‘we estimate that around 40 responses showed a degree of coordination, but we are confident that this has not changed the substance of the results.’ Meaning either they noticed our coordination but it didn’t affect our influence, or our coordination wasn’t noticed.
I think that this IDC consultation was also different in that we only pushed forward a single argument and provided a single version of that argument. Whereas the usual method is providing multiple arguments to push forward and different variations of them. The benefit of a single argument is the significantly less work required, however as one likely could have guessed, it also results in significantly less success.
For me this only enhances the need to have someone working on this full-time, which we are actually hiring for at the Global Policy Research Group. The contractor position will involve coordinating submissions from the UK/European effective altruism and adjacent communities to significant governmental consultations (on the core EA cause areas) to create policy change.
If you or someone you know would be interested, here is the Application Form.
If anyone has any positive or critical thoughts on this work or this role I am very open to hearing them!