Nik Samoylov

• Nik Samoylov 18 Jun 2023 4:55 UTC

  1 point

  0 ∶ 1

  in reply to: quinn’s comment on: Weekly Up­date from Cam­paign for AI Safety

  If you divvy up revenue of AI companies from diffusion models at current pricing, then yes.

  But if creators’ consent is first sought for training and if they have a chance to do individual or collective bargaining (the choice of form of bargaining needs to be with the creators) with AI companies, then payouts may be meaningful.

• Nik Samoylov 3 Jun 2023 1:28 UTC

  −2 points

  0 ∶ 1

  on: Catas­trophic Risks from Un­safe AI: Nav­i­gat­ing a Tightrope Sce­nario (Ben Garfinkel, EAG Lon­don 2023)

  Great write-up. However, the approaches suggested here sound too timid to be effective. Thank you for creating this post.

• Nik Samoylov 23 Apr 2023 11:26 UTC

  13 points

  1 ∶ 0

  on: Nik Samoy­lov’s Shortform

  Together with a few volunteers, we prepared a policy document for the Campaign for AI Safety to serve as a list of demands by the campaign.

  It is called “Strong and appropriate regulation of advanced AI to protect humanity”. It is currently geared towards Australiand and US policy-makers, and I think it’s not its last version.

  I would appreciate any comments!