I am super stoked to have completed the draft of my first article for the EA Forum! (In order to be able to post it, I’d really appreciate if you upvoted this comment.)
It is an actionable guide on ‘How to Measure and Optimize EA Marketing’. It puts key marketing strategy best-practices into an EA context, to help EA organisation attract more volunteers, donations, etc. It is part of the EA marketing Resource Bank, which I intend to add more articles to over the coming months.
It has been a thoroughly enjoyable are rewarding creative process so far. I can honestly say that I’m proud to share this work with the EA community. I’d like to give a big thanks to Gleb and all the Intentional Insights volunteers who have facilitated the process and provided feedback on the article: you have significantly improved the quality and usefulness of this piece.
Would you be able to provide any further information regarding the reasons for not recommending the proposal I submitted for an ‘X-Risk Project Database’? Ask: $12,375 for user research, setup, and feature development over 6 months.
Project summary:
Create a database of x-risk professionals and their work, starting with existing AI safety/x-risk projects at leading orgs, to improve coordination within the field.
The x-risk field and subfields are globally distributed and growing rapidly, yet x-risk professionals still have no simple way to find out about each other’s current work and capabilities. This results in missed opportunities for prioritisation, feedback and collaboration, thus retarding progress. To improve visibility and coordination within the x-risk field, and to expedite exceptional work, we will create a searchable database of leading x-risk professionals, organisations and their current work.
Application details
p.s. applause for the extensive explanations of grant recommendations!!