The people involved may deserve some sort of rehabilitation—the company should not. And then also, there’s a question of whether this process would allow them to run EA organizations and not just take part in them.
Edit: I used the word ‘company’, but I mean any organisation. I don’t know the status of NL.
Because there’s barely anything relevant that is common to both. We don’t have any moral obligation to companies, nor does it make the world better in my view to “rehabilitate” companies. A person has to continue existing in society even after committing a crime. A company doesn’t have to continue existing.
The people involved may deserve some sort of rehabilitation—the company should not. And then also, there’s a question of whether this process would allow them to run EA organizations and not just take part in them.
Edit: I used the word ‘company’, but I mean any organisation. I don’t know the status of NL.
Why do you distinguish between person and company in this respect?
Because there’s barely anything relevant that is common to both. We don’t have any moral obligation to companies, nor does it make the world better in my view to “rehabilitate” companies. A person has to continue existing in society even after committing a crime. A company doesn’t have to continue existing.