A version of this focusing on reliability of the investigation, quality of the evidence, etc is a much more plausible version though.
Definitely more plausible, but as a rule, “whenever you engage in some risky activity, you should do it to the standards of the top organizations who do it” doesn’t seem a priori plausible.
A version of this focusing on reliability of the investigation, quality of the evidence, etc is a much more plausible version though.
Definitely more plausible, but as a rule, “whenever you engage in some risky activity, you should do it to the standards of the top organizations who do it” doesn’t seem a priori plausible.