Considering these accusations (in some form or another) have been out for longer than a year, and non-linear has continued to be well respected by the community, I am worried that further “deadline pushing” only serves to launder nonlinear’s reputation. I am suspicious of the idea that many who write for the need to “hear both sides” will indeed update if nonlinear’s response is uncompelling.
I think that Ben probably should have waited the week.
At the same time, I’m still expecting to have a strongly negative opinion about Nonlinear’s leadership’s actions after seeing whatever they end up publishing.
Considering these accusations (in some form or another) have been out for longer than a year, and non-linear has continued to be well respected by the community, I am worried that further “deadline pushing” only serves to launder nonlinear’s reputation. I am suspicious of the idea that many who write for the need to “hear both sides” will indeed update if nonlinear’s response is uncompelling.
I think that Ben probably should have waited the week.
At the same time, I’m still expecting to have a strongly negative opinion about Nonlinear’s leadership’s actions after seeing whatever they end up publishing.
Disclaimer: I formerly interned at Nonlinear.