Very much appreciate the time and effort you put into this analysis. This sort of investigative journalism within the EA community seems worth funding ;)
For what it’s worth, I think of this analysis less as “investigative journalism”, and more as “independent vetting.” And in general, I’d like to see more resources available to support both grantmakers doing their own vetting, and independent analysts doing vetting from another perspective.
Very much appreciate the time and effort you put into this analysis. This sort of investigative journalism within the EA community seems worth funding ;)
Thank you very much!
For what it’s worth, I think of this analysis less as “investigative journalism”, and more as “independent vetting.” And in general, I’d like to see more resources available to support both grantmakers doing their own vetting, and independent analysts doing vetting from another perspective.