I think this would be really valuable! Linch really liked your post and note that he has good judgement and is well respected.
In the post I wanted to point out that the organisation has an unhealthy relationship with grantmakers… no incentive for the institution to actually provide any valuable research results. I have a better understanding of game theory now
I’m no one important, and I could be the only person who has this opinion:
I find that if I didn’t agree with someone’s judgement on a deep issue like institutions, when they add applied math (graph theory, control theory, bayesian statistics, game theory, etc.) this often won’t change my opinion. I could be wrong about this, and I would like to learn if I am. I just like to state this up front.
improve upon the post, if that would be considered helpful.
I think you should post a new post, or write the changes as a comment.
Almost no one will notice an old post being changed.
I think this would be really valuable! Linch really liked your post and note that he has good judgement and is well respected.
I’m no one important, and I could be the only person who has this opinion:
I find that if I didn’t agree with someone’s judgement on a deep issue like institutions, when they add applied math (graph theory, control theory, bayesian statistics, game theory, etc.) this often won’t change my opinion. I could be wrong about this, and I would like to learn if I am. I just like to state this up front.
I think you should post a new post, or write the changes as a comment.
Almost no one will notice an old post being changed.