I never knew the Abstinence Violation Effect had a name—I think that’s something I’ll have to add to my lexicon. :)
While reading through your post, I was having a bit of trouble understanding your arguments and, the evidence behind why you think this intervention is particularly important and neglected.
If I’m understanding correctly, your argument is:
More funding should be directed towards providing vegan food to soldiers, who experience difficulties maintaining a vegan diet. By providing this support, we could reduce the likelihood of soldiers falling victim to the Abstinence Violent Affect and abandoning their vegan diet altogether, which could affect ~4000 animals over the span of a given soldier’s life.
Hi Rakafet,
Welcome to the EA Forum!
I never knew the Abstinence Violation Effect had a name—I think that’s something I’ll have to add to my lexicon. :)
While reading through your post, I was having a bit of trouble understanding your arguments and, the evidence behind why you think this intervention is particularly important and neglected.
If I’m understanding correctly, your argument is:
Would you say that’s accurate?