i’ve written about the mistakes on the top of this post. i don’t know if it will help justify some of the wrongly said views.
i have also checked several sources and the evidence giving to the poor on the streets (and i mean the streets of london in this case) is quite mixed—some EAs have said they do it for ‘the warm fuzziness’ of helping someone.
i personally think it’s better to support a charity that helps people living on the streets rather than giving money, food or other necessities to them directly—although both actions do generate some good even if one is more than the other.
i’ve written about the mistakes on the top of this post.
i don’t know if it will help justify some of the wrongly said views.
i have also checked several sources and the evidence giving to the poor on the streets (and i mean the streets of london in this case) is quite mixed—some EAs have said they do it for ‘the warm fuzziness’ of helping someone.
i personally think it’s better to support a charity that helps people living on the streets rather than giving money, food or other necessities to them directly—although both actions do generate some good even if one is more than the other.