I think it is very likely that the top American AI labs are receiving substantial help from the NSA et al in implementing their āadministrative, technical, and physical cybersecurity protectionsā. No need to introduce Crowdstrike as a vulnerability.
The labs get fined if they donāt implement such protections, not if they get compromised.
I didnāt introduce Crowdstrike as a vulnerability.
The NSA doesnāt provide support to U.S. corporations. Thatās outside of its mandate.
When a lab gets compromised, there will be an investigation and the fault will almost certainly be placed with the lab unless the lab could prove negligence on the part of the cybersecurity company or companies that they contracted with.
None of us know what is in the classified portions of the US intelligence budgets. For example, I doubt there was a line item in the budget for bribing a major US security vendor to set as default an algorithm with a NSA trap door in it, but thereās pretty good reason to believe that happened.
I think it is very likely that the top American AI labs are receiving substantial help from the NSA et al in implementing their āadministrative, technical, and physical cybersecurity protectionsā. No need to introduce Crowdstrike as a vulnerability.
The labs get fined if they donāt implement such protections, not if they get compromised.
I didnāt introduce Crowdstrike as a vulnerability.
The NSA doesnāt provide support to U.S. corporations. Thatās outside of its mandate.
When a lab gets compromised, there will be an investigation and the fault will almost certainly be placed with the lab unless the lab could prove negligence on the part of the cybersecurity company or companies that they contracted with.
None of us know what is in the classified portions of the US intelligence budgets. For example, I doubt there was a line item in the budget for bribing a major US security vendor to set as default an algorithm with a NSA trap door in it, but thereās pretty good reason to believe that happened.