Our two main references are the Yang & Sandberg paper and the Critchlow book, both of which act as accessible summaries of the collective intelligence literature.
They’re linked just a little after the paragraph you quoted.
I think my issues with this response and linking to that paper are better explained by looking at this post from SSC (beware the man of one study). To be clear I think we can learn things from the sources you linked—my issue is with the (imo) overconfidence and claims about what “the science” says.
Hi Caleb,
Our two main references are the Yang & Sandberg paper and the Critchlow book, both of which act as accessible summaries of the collective intelligence literature.
They’re linked just a little after the paragraph you quoted.
I think my issues with this response and linking to that paper are better explained by looking at this post from SSC (beware the man of one study). To be clear I think we can learn things from the sources you linked—my issue is with the (imo) overconfidence and claims about what “the science” says.