I accounted for donations going to the area of ācreating a better futureā which were tagged as āmultiple cause areasā. GWWC tagged 11 % going to creating a better future, but I assumed 13.3 % (= 11/ā(65 + 7 + 11) = ātagged as creating a better futureā/ā(ātagged as improving human welfareā + ātagged as improving animal welfareā + ātagged as creating a better futureā)) went to creating a better future. This may not be accurate if the donations going to āmultiple cause areasā are disproportionally going to ācreating a better futureā, so I take the point that it would be better to explicitly analyse where the donations in the bucket of āmultiple cause areasā are going to.
I accounted for donations going to the area of ācreating a better futureā which were tagged as āmultiple cause areasā. GWWC tagged 11 % going to creating a better future, but I assumed 13.3 % (= 11/ā(65 + 7 + 11) = ātagged as creating a better futureā/ā(ātagged as improving human welfareā + ātagged as improving animal welfareā + ātagged as creating a better futureā)) went to creating a better future. This may not be accurate if the donations going to āmultiple cause areasā are disproportionally going to ācreating a better futureā, so I take the point that it would be better to explicitly analyse where the donations in the bucket of āmultiple cause areasā are going to.