Thanks, too, for the overview and bringing up the relative neglectedness.
Just a random question as an uninformed layperson: How optimistic are you about shareholders meaningfully influencing companies to invest more in safety and cooperation? I recently read about the idea that institutional investors might currently be using their influence to move companies into more climate-neutral avenues. Their motivation being among others that they believe climate-friendliness is in the longer term more profitable for their overall portfolio, even if it’s on net disadvantageous for a few individual firms. So I was wondering if something similar applies to AI: If all relevant firms have significant shared ownership, then this might reduce race dynamics meaningfully and lead to more safety investments.
Thanks, too, for the overview and bringing up the relative neglectedness.
Just a random question as an uninformed layperson: How optimistic are you about shareholders meaningfully influencing companies to invest more in safety and cooperation? I recently read about the idea that institutional investors might currently be using their influence to move companies into more climate-neutral avenues. Their motivation being among others that they believe climate-friendliness is in the longer term more profitable for their overall portfolio, even if it’s on net disadvantageous for a few individual firms. So I was wondering if something similar applies to AI: If all relevant firms have significant shared ownership, then this might reduce race dynamics meaningfully and lead to more safety investments.