I wanted to describe my personal experience in case it shifts anyone like me towards applying. I was accepted, received travel support, and went to EAG London last month.
Initially, I considered the likelihood that I would be accepted and be able to go very low: I didnât think I was involved enough in EA and I didnât think it made sense for me to receive travel support to go as I live very far from London. I also didnât think that I âdeservedâ to go: I reasoned that I shouldnât take a spot from someone more engaged in EA or could provide more value to other attendees. I probably wouldnât have applied if not for having a personal connection with someone else who applied.
Nearly every interaction I had at the conference was positive. Many people I spoke to were happy to share about their area even if I had little prior understanding, and I was surprised to find I had ideas and perspectives that were unique/âmight not have surfaced in conversation had I not been there.
As a young person, I have never felt more respected as a full person and equal with meaningful ideas to contribute. EAG is intenseâit can be near constant interaction with a lot of people, focused on the most important problems in the world. But going to EAG made me feel like a âpart ofâ EA, and gave me a lot more confidence to make decisions, to try things, to reach out to people.
If youâre like me and concerned about not being qualified or not having done enough, let the organisers judge, and consider the possibility that EAG might give you the ability to do more later.
âand I was surprised to find I had ideas and perspectives that were unique/âmight not have surfaced in conversation had I not been there.â
I think this is one of the reasons EAG (or other ways of informally conversing with regular EAs on EA-related things) can be extremely valuable for people. It lets you get epistemic and emotional feedback on how capable you are compared to a random EAG-sampled slice of the community. People who might have been underconfident (like you) update towards thinking they might be usefwl. That said, I think youâre unusually capable, and that a lot of other people will update towards feeling like theyâre too dumb for EA.
But the value of increased confidence in people like you seems higher value than the possible harm caused by people whose confidence drops. And there are reasons to expect online EA material to be a lot more intimidating due to being way more filtered for high-status (incl. smart), so exposure to low-filtered informal conversations in EAG probably causes higher confidence in people who havenât had had a lot of low-filtered informal exposure yet (so if that describes you, reader, you should definitely considering going). Personally, I have a history of feeling like everything I discover and learn is just a form of âcatching upâ to what everyone else already knows, so talking to people about my ideas has increased my confidence a lot.
I wanted to describe my personal experience in case it shifts anyone like me towards applying. I was accepted, received travel support, and went to EAG London last month.
Initially, I considered the likelihood that I would be accepted and be able to go very low: I didnât think I was involved enough in EA and I didnât think it made sense for me to receive travel support to go as I live very far from London. I also didnât think that I âdeservedâ to go: I reasoned that I shouldnât take a spot from someone more engaged in EA or could provide more value to other attendees. I probably wouldnât have applied if not for having a personal connection with someone else who applied.
Nearly every interaction I had at the conference was positive. Many people I spoke to were happy to share about their area even if I had little prior understanding, and I was surprised to find I had ideas and perspectives that were unique/âmight not have surfaced in conversation had I not been there.
As a young person, I have never felt more respected as a full person and equal with meaningful ideas to contribute. EAG is intenseâit can be near constant interaction with a lot of people, focused on the most important problems in the world. But going to EAG made me feel like a âpart ofâ EA, and gave me a lot more confidence to make decisions, to try things, to reach out to people.
If youâre like me and concerned about not being qualified or not having done enough, let the organisers judge, and consider the possibility that EAG might give you the ability to do more later.
I think this is one of the reasons EAG (or other ways of informally conversing with regular EAs on EA-related things) can be extremely valuable for people. It lets you get epistemic and emotional feedback on how capable you are compared to a random EAG-sampled slice of the community. People who might have been underconfident (like you) update towards thinking they might be usefwl. That said, I think youâre unusually capable, and that a lot of other people will update towards feeling like theyâre too dumb for EA.
But the value of increased confidence in people like you seems higher value than the possible harm caused by people whose confidence drops. And there are reasons to expect online EA material to be a lot more intimidating due to being way more filtered for high-status (incl. smart), so exposure to low-filtered informal conversations in EAG probably causes higher confidence in people who havenât had had a lot of low-filtered informal exposure yet (so if that describes you, reader, you should definitely considering going). Personally, I have a history of feeling like everything I discover and learn is just a form of âcatching upâ to what everyone else already knows, so talking to people about my ideas has increased my confidence a lot.