Not sure why this is tagged Community? Ticking one of these makes it EA Community:
The post is about EA as a cultural phenomenon (as opposed to EA as a project of doing good)
I think this is clearly about doing good, it does not rely on EA at all, only AI safety.
The post is about norms, attitudes or practices you’d like to see more or less of within the EA community
This is a practice that might be relevant to AI safety independent of EA.
The post would be irrelevant to someone who was interested in doing good effectively, but NOT interested in the effective altruism community
If this is indeed something that would help AI safety, I think someone interested in this topic but without any knowledge or interest in the EA Community would be highly relevant. I would welcome any explanation about why, given this, this question is about community?
The post concerns an ongoing conversation, scandal or discourse that would not be relevant to someone who doesn’t care about the EA community.
Again, this should be relevant to people that have no interest in EA but an interest in AI safety
Community seems the right categorisation to me—the main reason to care about this is understanding the existing funding landscape in AI safety, and how much to defer to them/trust their decisions. And I would consider basically all the large funders in AI Safety to also be in the EA space, even if they wouldn’t technically identify as EA.
More abstractly, a post about conflicts of interest and other personal factors, in a specific community of interest, seems to fit this category
Being categorised as community doesn’t mean the post is bad, of course!
Not sure why this is tagged Community? Ticking one of these makes it EA Community:
The post is about EA as a cultural phenomenon (as opposed to EA as a project of doing good)
I think this is clearly about doing good, it does not rely on EA at all, only AI safety.
The post is about norms, attitudes or practices you’d like to see more or less of within the EA community
This is a practice that might be relevant to AI safety independent of EA.
The post would be irrelevant to someone who was interested in doing good effectively, but NOT interested in the effective altruism community
If this is indeed something that would help AI safety, I think someone interested in this topic but without any knowledge or interest in the EA Community would be highly relevant. I would welcome any explanation about why, given this, this question is about community?
The post concerns an ongoing conversation, scandal or discourse that would not be relevant to someone who doesn’t care about the EA community.
Again, this should be relevant to people that have no interest in EA but an interest in AI safety
Community seems the right categorisation to me—the main reason to care about this is understanding the existing funding landscape in AI safety, and how much to defer to them/trust their decisions. And I would consider basically all the large funders in AI Safety to also be in the EA space, even if they wouldn’t technically identify as EA.
More abstractly, a post about conflicts of interest and other personal factors, in a specific community of interest, seems to fit this category
Being categorised as community doesn’t mean the post is bad, of course!