The weight of an individual’s voting rights will be capped (e.g. 2% maximum) to ensure broad-based decision power across the donor base.
It’s not obvious to me that this is the right call. For instance, it’s possible that some large EA donors are especially knowledgeable, and if so, it might be good not to cap their decision power.
I think it depends on a number of empirical issues which you would need to look into (e.g. it depends on what large donors would be interested) - but I wouldn’t prejudge this question.
Thanks, this is an interesting project.
It’s not obvious to me that this is the right call. For instance, it’s possible that some large EA donors are especially knowledgeable, and if so, it might be good not to cap their decision power.
I think it depends on a number of empirical issues which you would need to look into (e.g. it depends on what large donors would be interested) - but I wouldn’t prejudge this question.
Good point—thanks for flagging this.