Thanks! I think those are important especially in situation where organizations more or less explicitly collaborate on something but then fail to include the other as owner of certificates that they issue. That could cause the other to respond by ending their collaboration.
Have you written about similar existing efforts to measure impact and pay just for that impact through SIBs / pay for performance frameworks and things of that nature? There are real world examples that would be good to investigate.
I haven’t but I’m aware of a forthcoming report by Rethink Priorities that covers prize contests. If you find more research on that – or on the similar dynamic of hopes for acquisitions incentivizing entrepreneurship – I’d be very interested!
Thanks! I think those are important especially in situation where organizations more or less explicitly collaborate on something but then fail to include the other as owner of certificates that they issue. That could cause the other to respond by ending their collaboration.
I’ve written about similar problems in The Bulk of the Impact Iceberg and The Attribution Moloch.
Have you written about similar existing efforts to measure impact and pay just for that impact through SIBs / pay for performance frameworks and things of that nature? There are real world examples that would be good to investigate.
I haven’t but I’m aware of a forthcoming report by Rethink Priorities that covers prize contests. If you find more research on that – or on the similar dynamic of hopes for acquisitions incentivizing entrepreneurship – I’d be very interested!
Not a prize though this might be relevant: https://www.aqaix.com/case-studies/monterey-bay-stormwater-digital-master-plan