You claim this is non-partisan, yet you make highly partisan claims, such as “conservatives have relied much more on lies” (you cite Trump’s lies, but treating Trump as a conservative is objectionable to many conservatives).
You claim this is non-partisan, yet you make highly partisan claims,
I made a similar point on the LW version of this post. I think it is going to be hard to fix politics and the links between the object level and the meta level, which are especially strong in politics, are close to the root cause of why politics is so hard to be rational about.
But I feel like it might be useful to poke around a bit at that link.
Well, ok, are you really going to make this semantic argument with me? Trump is widely accepted by the Republican party as its leader. I’ll be happy to agree on using the term “Republican” instead of “conservative” to address your concerns.
You claim this is non-partisan, yet you make highly partisan claims, such as “conservatives have relied much more on lies” (you cite Trump’s lies, but treating Trump as a conservative is objectionable to many conservatives).
I made a similar point on the LW version of this post. I think it is going to be hard to fix politics and the links between the object level and the meta level, which are especially strong in politics, are close to the root cause of why politics is so hard to be rational about.
But I feel like it might be useful to poke around a bit at that link.
Well, ok, are you really going to make this semantic argument with me? Trump is widely accepted by the Republican party as its leader. I’ll be happy to agree on using the term “Republican” instead of “conservative” to address your concerns.