I strongly disagree with the comparison between (a) proposals to suspend EA funding for services which reduce the amount of future people and (b) criminalizing homosexuality.
I donāt think thereās any āsubtle misuse of languageā which causes one to be anywhere near the other. Isnāt the comparison between (a) and any of the analogues I gave in my above comment far more natural? How are any of those anywhere near criminalizing homosexuality? If anything, comparing (a) to criminalizing homosexuality could constitute a ādeliberate obfuscating move.ā
I think weāre both acting in good faith here, and Iām willing to admit a passion for this cause which can affect the impartiality with which I react to comments. All I can say is that I really donāt see things that way, and I donāt think thereās anything unreasonable about recognizing (a) and (b) as fundamentally different.
I strongly disagree with the comparison between (a) proposals to suspend EA funding for services which reduce the amount of future people and (b) criminalizing homosexuality.
I donāt think thereās any āsubtle misuse of languageā which causes one to be anywhere near the other. Isnāt the comparison between (a) and any of the analogues I gave in my above comment far more natural? How are any of those anywhere near criminalizing homosexuality? If anything, comparing (a) to criminalizing homosexuality could constitute a ādeliberate obfuscating move.ā
I think weāre both acting in good faith here, and Iām willing to admit a passion for this cause which can affect the impartiality with which I react to comments. All I can say is that I really donāt see things that way, and I donāt think thereās anything unreasonable about recognizing (a) and (b) as fundamentally different.