Strongly downvoted because, while pointing to some plausible failure mode of LLMs, this is very unnecessarily long, hard to read, and itโs not clear what is being tested or how.
The methodology here is observational. Itโs not about adversarial prompting, but about patterns that emerge in standard, long-form interactions.
The test: take the taxonomy (Social Autopilot, Second-Order Inertia, etc.) and observe any frontier model during a typical session. You will see these exact failure modes manifest as the model prioritizes maintaining a polite facade over cognitive coherence.
The length is necessary to categorize distinct systemic behaviors โโ consistent artifacts of how RLHF-based alignment functions in practice.
Strongly downvoted because, while pointing to some plausible failure mode of LLMs, this is very unnecessarily long, hard to read, and itโs not clear what is being tested or how.
The methodology here is observational. Itโs not about adversarial prompting, but about patterns that emerge in standard, long-form interactions.
The test: take the taxonomy (Social Autopilot, Second-Order Inertia, etc.) and observe any frontier model during a typical session. You will see these exact failure modes manifest as the model prioritizes maintaining a polite facade over cognitive coherence.
The length is necessary to categorize distinct systemic behaviors โโ consistent artifacts of how RLHF-based alignment functions in practice.