One can discern from the spreadsheet where the points of each eliminated organization went, at least initially:
It does not appear that any organization’s elimination “sent” points predominately to orgs in the same cause area.
GWWC’s elimination predominately sent points to organizations I would classify as neartermist.
EAIF’s elimination sent over twice as many points to LTFF as to the next highest benefactor (RP).
LTFF’s elimination sent almost as many points to RP as the other two winners.
None of this was too unexpected to me, but it is mildly interesting to get harder data on the relationship between cause area support and support for specific cross-cause / meta organizations. Specifically, we can see which cross-cause organizations voters tended to gravitate toward when an object-level charity in a given cause was eliminated.
(I only marked third-place gains that subjectively seemed to clearly exceed the rest of the field.)
One can discern from the spreadsheet where the points of each eliminated organization went, at least initially:
It does not appear that any organization’s elimination “sent” points predominately to orgs in the same cause area.
GWWC’s elimination predominately sent points to organizations I would classify as neartermist.
EAIF’s elimination sent over twice as many points to LTFF as to the next highest benefactor (RP).
LTFF’s elimination sent almost as many points to RP as the other two winners.
None of this was too unexpected to me, but it is mildly interesting to get harder data on the relationship between cause area support and support for specific cross-cause / meta organizations. Specifically, we can see which cross-cause organizations voters tended to gravitate toward when an object-level charity in a given cause was eliminated.
(I only marked third-place gains that subjectively seemed to clearly exceed the rest of the field.)