Thank you for your response. I apologize for the stronger language that I used in the first public version of this post. I believe that here you do not address most of the points I made either in the first public version or in the version that was up here at the moment of your comment.
I will not change the post here without explicitly noting it, now that you have replied.
I’m in the process of preparing a longer reply to you.
In particular, the version of the essay that I initially posted here did not discuss the strength of the relationship between income and happiness in rich and poor countries—I agree that this was a weak argument.
Hi William,
Thank you for your response. I apologize for the stronger language that I used in the first public version of this post. I believe that here you do not address most of the points I made either in the first public version or in the version that was up here at the moment of your comment.
I will not change the post here without explicitly noting it, now that you have replied.
I’m in the process of preparing a longer reply to you.
In particular, the version of the essay that I initially posted here did not discuss the strength of the relationship between income and happiness in rich and poor countries—I agree that this was a weak argument.