This is interesting, I can get your reasoning behind this. I’m also sure this helps you.
However, I would have liked a few more things :
While your debate policy works for you, it sets a very high bar. Debating with people making 20 articles… well this greatly restrains the pool of people to talk to, so I don’t see this applied on the EA Forum.
It could be interesting, for instance, to propose a debate policy that could work for the EA Forum.
Your post is interesting, but I feel like it could improve by having examples (same in your debate policy I think). There are one or two at the beginning but only at the beginning. I like seeing examples to anchor in my mind what that these rules would look like in a real conversation.
Maybe put your debate policy more prominently in this post, otherwise we have trouble grasping what the concept means.
This is interesting, I can get your reasoning behind this. I’m also sure this helps you.
However, I would have liked a few more things :
While your debate policy works for you, it sets a very high bar. Debating with people making 20 articles… well this greatly restrains the pool of people to talk to, so I don’t see this applied on the EA Forum.
It could be interesting, for instance, to propose a debate policy that could work for the EA Forum.
Your post is interesting, but I feel like it could improve by having examples (same in your debate policy I think). There are one or two at the beginning but only at the beginning. I like seeing examples to anchor in my mind what that these rules would look like in a real conversation.
Maybe put your debate policy more prominently in this post, otherwise we have trouble grasping what the concept means.
I replied to the other partial-copy of this message at https://​​forum.effectivealtruism.org/​​posts/​​o8ps3uC68AFkGivTJ/​​my-experience-with-my-debate-policy?commentId=LkcMac7rX2hboSnaZ#LxQdSK7nnyMezGbCm