I don’t perceive a need to be frugal with upvotes. I was surprised this article didn’t get as upvoted either, because I believe it covers a very important issue. Having read the article, I’m not too surprised by new information. Maybe others feel the same, because as users of this forum we’re already familiar with 80,000 Hours methodology, and feel as if this is a rehash.
I’ve upvoted the article so it will get more visibility, because more important than what’s written in it is attracting the critical feedback that 80,000 Hours is seeking.
I don’t perceive a need to be frugal with upvotes. I was surprised this article didn’t get as upvoted either, because I believe it covers a very important issue. Having read the article, I’m not too surprised by new information. Maybe others feel the same, because as users of this forum we’re already familiar with 80,000 Hours methodology, and feel as if this is a rehash.
I’ve upvoted the article so it will get more visibility, because more important than what’s written in it is attracting the critical feedback that 80,000 Hours is seeking.
Yeah, I’d say the main factor in lack of upvotes was the lack of new insight or substantive points to (dis)agree with.