I’m also confused by this. The use of “and” (instead of, say, “in that”, “because”, or “to the extent that”) suggests that they’ve verified counterfactuality in some stronger way than just “the money won’t go to us this season if you don’t donate”, but then they should be telling us how they know this.
I’m also confused by this. The use of “and” (instead of, say, “in that”, “because”, or “to the extent that”) suggests that they’ve verified counterfactuality in some stronger way than just “the money won’t go to us this season if you don’t donate”, but then they should be telling us how they know this.