To clarify, this refers to those who actually changed causes, specifically, right?
Reducing risks from AI is the most common top priority today, but by no means the majority, among those who prioritized Global Poverty or Animal Welfare when they joined EA.
For the “Mean cause rating and sub grouping” table, it would be helpful to have the total ratings too, for comparison, so we can see how veg*ns, meat eaters, men and women differ from the average.
On your first point, yes you are correct. Among those who prioritized Global Poverty OR Animal Welfare AND changed causes, pluralities of them changed to AI.
On your second point, I’ve now added a column in the group membership and demographics tables that shows the average for the sample as a whole. I hope this helps.
Thanks for this!
To clarify, this refers to those who actually changed causes, specifically, right?
For the “Mean cause rating and sub grouping” table, it would be helpful to have the total ratings too, for comparison, so we can see how veg*ns, meat eaters, men and women differ from the average.
Hi,
On your first point, yes you are correct. Among those who prioritized Global Poverty OR Animal Welfare AND changed causes, pluralities of them changed to AI.
On your second point, I’ve now added a column in the group membership and demographics tables that shows the average for the sample as a whole. I hope this helps.
Thanks!