Without directly confronting you (it’s wrong and not acceptable), and writing in an impartial voice:
These pictures and videos are a deliberate comment/critique on the hidden effects of current aesthetics and norms of discussion.
Here, your reaction is being intentionally provoked, because they are further illustrations of what the critique views as defective: the prioritization of aesthetics over content. (Any number of the points being made, about for-profit entities, alternative theories of change, seem monumental, even if half true, but “We’ll downvote them because of a picture”.)
Without directly confronting you (it’s wrong and not acceptable), and writing in an impartial voice:
These pictures and videos are a deliberate comment/critique on the hidden effects of current aesthetics and norms of discussion.
Here, your reaction is being intentionally provoked, because they are further illustrations of what the critique views as defective: the prioritization of aesthetics over content. (Any number of the points being made, about for-profit entities, alternative theories of change, seem monumental, even if half true, but “We’ll downvote them because of a picture”.)