Executive summary: The author argues that humanity is worth saving because technological advancement and human altruism are likely to reduce suffering and increase happiness in the future, outweighing historical harms and coordination failures.
Key points:
Humans will likely develop technologies to reduce suffering and increase happiness, and if sufficiently advanced, could even enable extraordinary bliss or reduce wild animal suffering through technological intervention.
High-value futures—those with vast populations or artificial beings—will probably also have positive welfare because technological advancement tends to accompany population growth, and creators would have no incentive to design suffering into artificial beings.
Territorial expansion by humans reduces wild animal carrying capacity, which could substantially decrease wild animal suffering if the trend continues.
Factory farming will likely end soon because more energy-efficient alternatives to raising sentient animals for meat will be developed.
Humans are a particularly altruistic species that voluntarily help others without expectation of reciprocity, suggesting they will guide the future toward moral justice.
Risks to a positive future include historical human atrocities, the tendency of sadistic individuals to gain political power, unintended negative outcomes from system dynamics (though the author believes increased education and coordination technology can mitigate these), and the possibility of accidentally creating vast suffering through terraforming or misdesigned digital beings.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, andcontact us if you have feedback.
Executive summary: The author argues that humanity is worth saving because technological advancement and human altruism are likely to reduce suffering and increase happiness in the future, outweighing historical harms and coordination failures.
Key points:
Humans will likely develop technologies to reduce suffering and increase happiness, and if sufficiently advanced, could even enable extraordinary bliss or reduce wild animal suffering through technological intervention.
High-value futures—those with vast populations or artificial beings—will probably also have positive welfare because technological advancement tends to accompany population growth, and creators would have no incentive to design suffering into artificial beings.
Territorial expansion by humans reduces wild animal carrying capacity, which could substantially decrease wild animal suffering if the trend continues.
Factory farming will likely end soon because more energy-efficient alternatives to raising sentient animals for meat will be developed.
Humans are a particularly altruistic species that voluntarily help others without expectation of reciprocity, suggesting they will guide the future toward moral justice.
Risks to a positive future include historical human atrocities, the tendency of sadistic individuals to gain political power, unintended negative outcomes from system dynamics (though the author believes increased education and coordination technology can mitigate these), and the possibility of accidentally creating vast suffering through terraforming or misdesigned digital beings.
This comment was auto-generated by the EA Forum Team. Feel free to point out issues with this summary by replying to the comment, and contact us if you have feedback.