The point was meant to be that at that price, it seems cheaper to create selfish incentives to become vegetarian/vegan/everything-but-factory-farmed-products-ian. If that’s the best deal we currently have via nudging people to be more moral, maybe philanthropists should be thinking more about funding market solutions such as subsidies for vegan products.
Would you increase your consumption of other animals, such that your meat consumption stayed relatively stable?
I was joking.
The point was meant to be that at that price, it seems cheaper to create selfish incentives to become vegetarian/vegan/everything-but-factory-farmed-products-ian. If that’s the best deal we currently have via nudging people to be more moral, maybe philanthropists should be thinking more about funding market solutions such as subsidies for vegan products.