I think “The Case for Strong Longtermism” should be revised to not say things like “we can in the first instance often simply ignore all the effects contained in the first 100 (or even 1000) years”, without detailing significant caveats.
FYI, this has already happened. The version you are linking to is outdated, and the updated version here does no longer contain this statement.
FYI, this has already happened. The version you are linking to is outdated, and the updated version here does no longer contain this statement.